🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be cut by more than half, after a divisive law change that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by first submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities often spent years building local support and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to create different wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their seats.