🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many federal defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.