🔗 Share this article

Imagine this: a smiling the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, juxtapose that with a dejected Benjamin Sesko in a Manchester United kit, looking as if he's missed an open goal. Do not bother finding an actual photo of him missing; background information is your adversary. Now, include statistics in a big, comical font. Remember the emojis. Post the image across all platforms.

Would you mention that Højlund's tally features strikes in the Champions League while Sesko does not compete in continental tournaments? Certainly not. And will you highlight that four of Højlund's goals came against weaker national sides, or that his national team is much stronger to Slovenia and creates far more chances. If you manage online for a major brand, raw engagement is what pays the bills, United are the biggest draw, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

So the cycle of content spins. The next job is to scan a 44-minute podcast featuring the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he calls the signing of Sesko "strange". Just before, where Schmeichel prefaces his remarks by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. Nobody needs that. Simply ensure "weird" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. The audience will be outraged.

This Time of Promise and Hasty Opinions

Mid-autumn has traditionally one of my preferred periods to watch football. The leaves swirl, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are still fresh, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. The stars of the season ahead are planting their flags. The summer market is closed. No one is mentioning the multiple trophies yet. Everyone are in contention. At this precise point, all is possibility.

Yet, for many of the same reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my least favourite times to consume news on football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is reborn. Florian Wirtz has been a crushing disappointment. Is Antoine Semenyo the best player in the league at this moment? Please a decision immediately.

Sesko as The Prime Example

In many ways, Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this context, a player caught between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The imperative to delay final conclusions, to let layers of technical texture and tactical sophistication to mature. And the demand to generate instant definitive judgment, a constant stream of opinions and memes, context-free condemnations and meaningless comparisons, a square that can not truly be solved.

I do not propose to offer a in-depth analysis of Sesko's stint at United to date. The guy has been in the lineup on four occasions in the Premier League in a wildly inconsistent team, scored two goals, and taken a grand total of 116 contacts with the ball. What precisely are we analysing? And do I propose to duplicate the pundits' seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits argue thrillingly on a popular show over whether he needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this season (one pundit), or whether it is more like 12 or 13 (the other).

A Harsh Reality

Despite this I enjoyed watching Sesko at Leipzig: a powerful, fast sports car of a forward, playing in a team ideally suited to his talents: given the license to attack but also the freedom to miss. And in part this is why Manchester United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are summarily issued in about the time it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most ruthless gulf between the patience and space he requires, and the opportunity he is likely to receive.

We saw a case of this over the national team pause, when a widely shared infographic handily informed us that the player had been deemed – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the summer transfer window by a survey of 20 agents. And of course, the press are not the only ones in such behavior. Club channels, online personalities, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of pornbot followers: everybody with a vested interest is now basically aligned along the identical rules, an ecosystem deliberately geared for provocation.

The Mental Cost

Endless scrolling and tapping. What is happening to ourselves? Are we aware, on any level, what this infinite stream of aggravation is doing to our brains? Separate from the essential weirdness of being a player in the middle of this, knowing on some surreal butterfly-effect level that every single thing about players is now essentially content, product, public property to be repackaged and exchanged.

Indeed, partly this is because it's Manchester United, the corpse that keeps nourishing the cycle, a big club that must constantly be producing the big feelings. But also, in part this is a temporary malaise, a swing of judgment most visibly and harshly observed at this season, roughly four weeks after the transfer market shut. Throughout the summer we have been desiring players, eulogising them, drooling over them. Now, only a handful of games later, many of those same players are now being disdained as broken goods. Is it time to worry about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need their striker wise? What was the point of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It feels appropriate that he meets their rivals on Sunday: a team simultaneously 13 months unbeaten at home in the league and yet in their own state of perceived turmoil, like submitting a a report on someone who went to the store 30 minutes ago. Too open. Mohamed Salah finished. Alexander Isak an expensive flop. Arne Slot losing his hair.

Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the storyline of football has started to replace football itself, to inflect the way we view it, an whole competition repivoted around talking points and reaction, an activity that occurs in the backdrop while we browse through our devices, incapable to detach from the saline drip of takes and further hot takes. It may be Sesko taking the hit at present. However, everyone is sacrificing a part of the experience here.